Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 622 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 339 vs 308 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $108.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.32 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
308
90.85545722713864%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
76.1904761904762%
Price, $
$130
83%
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361021 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
339
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
81.45424836601308%
Multi-Core
2858
50.4857798975446%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |