Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $80.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 44% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.24 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 378 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
336
88.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360461 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
378
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
55.81395348837209%
Price, $
$160.68
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
47.90528233151184%
Multi-Core
3013
34.604341334558406%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |