Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $80.0 vs $170.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-9600K - $0.5 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 198 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
80.8080808080808%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360446 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
58.139534883720934%
Price, $
$170
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
61.44859813084113%
Multi-Core
3013
46.58317872603587%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |