Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 194 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $94.05 vs $170.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9600K - $0.52 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 12 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
59.09090909090909%
Price, $
$170
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
93.81443298969072%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
68.92523364485982%
Multi-Core
5480
84.7247990105133%
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |