Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 135 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-9100T - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $99.0 vs $99.97
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
99%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280544 minutes ago
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |