Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $99.97 vs $112.53
- Up to 10% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-10400F - $0.43 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 234 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
232
99.14529914529915%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
89.58333333333334%
Price, $
$112.53
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
86.02225312934631%
Multi-Core
5263
91.51451921404973%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |