Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 444 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 104 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $80.0 vs $99.97
- Up to 18% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.71 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
81.60919540229885%
Price, $
$99.97
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
97.11538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
85.04446240905416%
Multi-Core
3013
57.248717461523846%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |