Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $79.0 vs $99.97
- Up to 16% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.51 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
83.60655737704919%
Price, $
$99.97
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354094 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
93.93939393939394%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
42.44139046079224%
Multi-Core
1085
20.615618468554057%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |