Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 791 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $99.95 vs $109.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.59 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
90.76923076923076%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353957 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
95.11986301369863%
Multi-Core
3023
52.17466344494305%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |