Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $99.9 vs $109.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.46 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
90%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280351 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |