Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3209 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i7-920 - 202 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $90.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.46 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
85.18518518518519%
Price, $
$109.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353953 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
194
96.03960396039604%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
35.53082191780822%
Multi-Core
1434
24.74974111149465%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |