Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 437 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 100 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $94.05 vs $109.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.94 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280336 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |