Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1585 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6350 - 157 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $100.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.67 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
95%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280365 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |