Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9920X is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $595.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 26% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.42 vs $4.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
98%
Value, $/FPS
$4.61/FPS
74%
Price, $
$788.88
75%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280544 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$595
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |