Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 35 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-8100 - 278 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $109.99 vs $110.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280476 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |