Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1424 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Core i3-540 - 156 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-540 - $46.41 vs $90.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-540 - $0.3 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 53 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
152
97.43589743589743%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
50.847457627118644%
Price, $
$90
51%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |