Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $46.41 vs $372.84
- Up to 85% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-9900 - $0.38 vs $2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 22% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1820 - 149 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
122
81.87919463087249%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349391 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
15.2%
Price, $
$372.84
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.477963997517072%
Multi-Core
825
11.451971127151582%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |