Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $46.41 vs $389.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-9700F - $0.22 vs $1.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1820 - 244 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
208
85.24590163934425%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349395 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
13.749999999999998%
Price, $
$389.88
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.697869593285994%
Multi-Core
825
13.187340153452684%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |