Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $39.95 vs $112.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-9400F - $0.19 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 238 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
88.65546218487394%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
40.42553191489362%
Price, $
$112
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.16255442670537%
Multi-Core
992
20.521307405875053%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |