Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $39.95 vs $375.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-7820X - $0.14 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - 294 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
276
93.87755102040816%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349410 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
10.937500000000002%
Price, $
$375
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
41.17647058823529%
Multi-Core
992
12.638552681870301%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |