Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $39.95 vs $375.22
- Up to 88% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.21 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 214 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
89.25233644859813%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
Buy for $375.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |