Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 58 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $98.02 vs $195.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.78 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3930 - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
125
93.98496240601504%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348901 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
53.06122448979592%
Price, $
$195
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
60.49751243781094%
Multi-Core
1043
20.45098039215686%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |