Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $98.02 vs $205.5
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.67 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 195 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
74.87179487179488%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
63.80952380952382%
Price, $
$205.5
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.76470588235294%
Multi-Core
1043
12.903624891748114%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |