Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $98.02 vs $100.0
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 341 vs 322 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - $0.29 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
322
94.42815249266863%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
96.66666666666667%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354057 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
341
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
50.9212730318258%
Multi-Core
1043
44.648972602739725%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |