Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 51 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 57% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930 - 72 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $94.98 vs $98.02
- Up to 38% better value when playing Starfield than Celeron G3930 - $1.32 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280473 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |