Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-3770 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1710 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Celeron G3930 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $80.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing God of War than Celeron G3930 - $0.48 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
99.39393939393939%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
80%
Price, $
$98.02
81%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354051 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
90.61102831594636%
Multi-Core
1043
45.3675511091779%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |