Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 1898 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930 - 94 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $82.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930 - $0.87 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280475 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |