Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2969 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Core i7-920 - 161 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 8% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $90.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3930 - $0.59 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280445 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |