Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $98.02 vs $299.95
- Up to 64% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600 - $0.88 vs $2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 123 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
91.05691056910568%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
36.0655737704918%
Price, $
$299.95
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.50538315389487%
Multi-Core
1043
16.890688259109314%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |