Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $98.02 vs $369.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.51 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 230 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
83.04347826086956%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
31.67701863354037%
Price, $
$369.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
21.05992379632837%
Multi-Core
1043
5.92411677837101%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |