Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $98.02 vs $376.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-12900K - $0.63 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 21% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3930 - 188 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
156
82.97872340425532%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
31.343283582089555%
Price, $
$376.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $376.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
23.206106870229007%
Multi-Core
1043
6.752994496600842%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |