Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 174 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $98.02 vs $375.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-7820X - $3.5 vs $7.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 86% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930 - 52 vs 28 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
28
53.84615384615385%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.21/FPS
48.54368932038835%
Price, $
$375
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.09000708717222%
Multi-Core
1043
13.288316983055164%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |