Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $98.02 vs $375.22
- Up to 70% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.38 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3930 - 300 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
259
86.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
30.4%
Price, $
$375.22
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
27.775239835541342%
Multi-Core
1043
8.578008059873344%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |