Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $50.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 60% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600KF - $0.4 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 159 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
78.61635220125787%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348900 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
39.603960396039604%
Price, $
$160.68
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348900 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.051001821493628%
Multi-Core
1051
12.070747674285059%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |