Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $50.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-13100 - $0.26 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 54 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 216 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
88.42592592592592%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
37.68115942028986%
Price, $
$147.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
27.34132268086995%
Multi-Core
1051
14.324655853891235%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |