Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $50.0 vs $170.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-9600K - $0.16 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 360 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
322
89.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348911 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
34.04255319148937%
Price, $
$170
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.981308411214954%
Multi-Core
1051
16.24922696351268%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |