Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $50.0 vs $150.95
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400 - $0.26 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 210 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
90.95238095238095%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348904 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
36.111111111111114%
Price, $
$150.95
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
31.752577319587626%
Multi-Core
1051
14.397260273972604%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |