Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 1478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $50.0 vs $134.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.45 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
87.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349026 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
42.857142857142854%
Price, $
$134.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $134.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
30.359783144406112%
Multi-Core
1051
12.308232814146855%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |