Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1934 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $70.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.63 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
111
93.27731092436974%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
48.46153846153846%
Price, $
$155
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
44.18402777777778%
Multi-Core
1018
21.02871307581078%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |