Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1934 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $70.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.63 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
111
94.0677966101695%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
40.12738853503184%
Price, $
$185
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
45.69120287253142%
Multi-Core
1018
18.546183275642196%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |