Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2670 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $70.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.45 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3210 - 171 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
155
90.64327485380117%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
51.13636363636363%
Price, $
$150
46%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
30.479041916167667%
Multi-Core
1018
17.572932849991368%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
