Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3396 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $70.0 vs $134.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 188% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - 72 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 33% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - $1.87 vs $2.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
25
34.72222222222222%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
66.78571428571429%
Price, $
$70
100%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.99
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $134.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
25.086249383932973%
Multi-Core
1018
11.921770699145098%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |