Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3229 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $70.0 vs $187.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-12600K - $0.37 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than Core i3-3210 - 220 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
190
86.36363636363636%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
43.529411764705884%
Price, $
$187.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $187.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
20.77551020408163%
Multi-Core
1018
8.632971506105834%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |