Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3655 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $70.0 vs $591.89
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.37 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Core i3-3210 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
190
82.25108225108225%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
14.453125%
Price, $
$591.89
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
17.443454420836186%
Multi-Core
1018
5.185147455814191%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |