Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2117 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $70.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-9920X - $0.57 vs $4.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 142 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
86.61971830985915%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.19/FPS
13.603818615751786%
Price, $
$595
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
36.02264685067233%
Multi-Core
1018
10.781614064816775%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |