Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 1246 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $70.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 88% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6950X - $0.57 vs $4.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
88.48920863309353%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.68/FPS
12.179487179487179%
Price, $
$651.07
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |