Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1521 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $70.0 vs $195.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.64 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 3% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-3210 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
110
97.34513274336283%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
36.994219653179194%
Price, $
$195
35%
FPS Winner
AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
50.64676616915423%
Multi-Core
1018
19.96078431372549%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
