Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $70.0 vs $205.5
- Up to 62% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700KF - $0.45 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3210 - 172 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
155
90.11627906976744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
37.815126050420176%
Price, $
$205.5
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
29.94117647058824%
Multi-Core
1018
12.594333786960288%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |