Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3258 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3258 is 517 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3210 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $51.36 vs $70.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3210 - $0.43 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 53 vs 55 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
72.88135593220339%
Price, $
$70
73%
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
83.03425774877651%
Multi-Core
1018
94.78584729981378%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
