Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 1211 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-860 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $48.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.32 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
68.08510638297874%
Price, $
$70
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349768 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
149
99.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |